Which two attacks aim to target support aircraft operations indirectly?

The selection of Air Interdiction and Strategic Attack as the correct answer is founded on the indirect nature of these operations in relation to support aircraft operations.

Air Interdiction is focused on disrupting enemy forces, supplies, and reinforcements before they can affect battlefield engagements. This proactive approach aims to impede the enemy's ability to conduct operations, which can include targeting support aircraft indirectly by hitting their supply and operational lines.

Strategic Attack, on the other hand, targets an adversary’s broader operational capabilities and infrastructure, sometimes including logistics and support networks. By disrupting these critical components, the effectiveness of support aircraft is compromised, making it more difficult for them to perform their roles in the theater of operations.

In contrast, the other choices involve more direct engagements or support roles. Defensive strike typically targets immediate threats, often in response to direct actions against friendly assets, whereas Precision strike and Close air support focus on delivering accurate munitions directly against specified targets in support of ground forces. Therefore, these operations are more aligned with direct engagement rather than the indirect targeting of support aircraft operations.