What tactic should a 4-ship of F-16s employ against 2 GROUPs that are 21 NM apart?

In a scenario where a 4-ship formation of F-16s is facing two groups that are 21 nautical miles apart, employing a wall formation is particularly effective for maximizing engagement capabilities while maintaining situational awareness. The wall formation allows for optimal positioning, enabling the aircraft to spread out horizontally across the battlefield. This alignment increases the field of fire, allowing each aircraft to cover different sectors and engage threats simultaneously while being able to maintain communication and coordination among the flight.

The wall also supports robust defensive measures, as it decreases the chances of being outflanked by an adversary. Given the separation between the two groups of targets, the wall formation enables the F-16s to engage one group effectively while keeping the other group in view for potential follow-up engagements. This tactic allows for enhanced flexibility and responsiveness against multiple targets spread over a larger area.

In contrast, other formations such as the V-formation, funnel, and box are less suited for this scenario due to their configuration limitations. The V-formation typically emphasizes coordinated flight and energy conservation but does not optimize weapons employment over extended distances, whereas the funnel formation focuses on drawing in targets but may compromise defensive positioning. The box formation can provide mutual support but is less effective when it comes to